Skip to main content

Reducing rejected laboratory specimens

CQC Areas

  • Safe (Safe systems)
  • Safe (Infection prevention)
  • Well-led (Partnerships & Communities)
  • Well-led (Learning, Improvement & Innovation)
  • Well-led (Environmental Sustainability)

The benefits of this project

Project benefits for Your Patients

Benefits for Your Patients

  • Reduced delays in diagnosis & treatment
  • Fewer trips needed to GP practice
Project benefits for Your Practice

Benefits for Your Practice

  • Financial & time savings from reduced use of specimen containers
  • Reduced clinician time to collect specimens
Project benefits for The Planet

Benefits for The Planet

  • Carbon savings from reduced journeys to drop off specimens (1.06 kgCO2e per average return patient journey to GP practice )  
  • Reduced waste from specimen containers

Opportunity for improvement

  • Accurate, efficient testing is crucial for patient care, but a significant proportion of samples sent to laboratories are rejected.  This leads to repeat testing, causing delays in diagnosis and treatment for patients as well as increased waste and transportation costs (financial and carbon).   
  • There are multiple reasons for sample rejection but typically, the errors are pre-analytical, e.g. incorrect specimen container or labelling.   
  • This quality improvement project aims to reduce rates of rejected infection sciences specimens by using a ‘quick guide’ for staff on specimen collection, outlining which containers to use, when to use them and how to label and transport them (see disclaimers).  

How to carry out this project

  1. Look at this Infection Sciences Quick Reference Guide:

    Infection Sciences Quick Reference Guide

    See if your area has something similar already.

  2. Discuss the guide with your local Microbiology Department.

    If there is not a similar guide already, would they be interested in adapting this one for use in your area?  If there is one already, would they be interested in working together to publicise it further and raise staff awareness of it?  Can they give you current data on rejected specimens so that any improvements can be measured?

  3. Produce a suitable guide.

    Work with the Microbiology team and wider Infection Sciences team to do this.

  4. Discuss with your local IT department

    Discuss the possibility of adding information about sample collection (e.g. correct specimen pot, if sample can be stored overnight or needs to be collected at a certain time of day) and a link to the guide on the IT test requesting platform.  This might be as an electronic ‘pop-up’ or embedded in the test request screen.  This would remind clinicians requesting tests e.g. GPs and the phlebotomists and HCAs collecting the samples.

  5. Publicise the guide and pop-ups to staff

    Especially nurses and HCAs in primary care.  This might be done by uploading it to the local guidelines’ website, GP & nurse educational events, newsletters, practice clinical meetings, placing printed guides on walls in nurse rooms etc.

  6. Re-check the data on rejected specimens

    Analyse if any changes have happened.  If not, why not?  If yes, how can they be sustained?  Ask the Microbiology department to keep the guideline up to date and to keep publicising it at regular intervals.  Use the Project Monitoring form to keep track of when to review the project in future.

How to scale this project up or down

Please note - Use of this project requires NetworkPLUS membership. If you would like to share this project with others, please invite them to purchase their own membership—access must not be shared with non-members.

Your local infection sciences department may be able to help you track the rates of rejected samples from your practice.  Why not work with some other local GP practices to drive some friendly competition?    

You might like to ask your blood sciences department if they have a similar quick reference guide for their tests.

Have you completed this QIP?

Tell us a little about your project and enter your data in order to generate a certificate showing the probable cost savings and other benefits. This project may help with CQC evidence submission (see disclaimers).

NetworkPLUS content

Our Project Library is only available to NetworkPLUS members. Please log in or sign up to continue.